![]() ![]()
If K3 was supplied with Silkypix I would have considered it a bonus. Now I am trying to think of good reasons why users of these cameras don't deserve the same stripped down program. The fact is, according to their website Pentax put "Silkypix Lite" in the boxes of some of their cameras: the Qs, k01, k-30. Where I come from that is still legal, even encouraged. Now it is deliberately crippled and I am dissappointed and expresses that in words. All they had to do was to stay closer to the source (of a consumer program). With alogoriths tuned to Pentax cameras colour characterics and with a feature (lens correction) that you otherwise have to support Adobe to get. The thing is, I think PDCU could have been an excellent program of great use to us. I rarely hear people express their love of the program, so take comfort in knowing I am not alone. I wrote some arguments in favour of my view, but came to think it is not worth it. I write 3 paragraphs, one of them is a critique of Pentax. Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II TransceiverĪnd a hello to you, MacGregor. #Silkypix developer studio 4 review downloadMy Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article. Many people report excellent output results from PDCU once it is understood. Just because many more experienced users don't process in this manner (eg using Lightroom or something else & don't apply camera custom settings) doesn't of itself mean the approach is poor or inferior. The approach is obviously intended to allow users to retrospectively apply camera settings (plus a few extras) to their RAW files in case of error in setting up the camera for the shoot, or if not using JPEGs and you like the camera menu controls. ![]() #Silkypix developer studio 4 review softwareIn this way it mimics certain of the menu items and custom image control as laid out on the camera LCD interface - this is the extent of the 'destructive hands of Pentax software hacks'. PDCU is not intended to act as some sort of 'Silkypix Lite' freebie - the interface layout is designed to represent the key image editing features of the cameras. It would be better to step back and consider how PDCU relates both to other RAW converters and to the cameras themselves. This sort of ignorant stuff is hardly helpful. PhotoFun Studio 3.1 HD Edition, Silkypix Developer Studio 3.Is Pentax still keeping that cr*p alive? PDCU5 is Silkypix run through the destructive hands of Pentax' software hacks? I thought they were supplying the original Silkypix, just not the latest incarnation. #Silkypix developer studio 4 review 1080pUnless you’re desperate for 1080p video, there are better options. ![]() For this much money we’d want better performance and quality, and a true optical viewfinder. At more than a thousand pounds including VAT, the DMC-GH1 is incredibly expensive. And in continuous mode it hit a maximum speed of 3.8fps, although over five seconds it ran at a less impressive 1.7fps. Shot-to-shot time was negligible, except when processing long exposures. Impressively, the DMC-GH1 performs like a DSLR. It also shoots 1080p HD video at 24fps, and has a stereo microphone. #Silkypix developer studio 4 review plusThe 10x zoom is the most powerful here, and the image stabilisation is a particular plus on a lens this long. The Micro Four Thirds sensor has a crop factor of 2x, which means the maximum focal length of any lens is doubled: the 140mm lens of this kit is equivalent to 280mm on a 35mm-frame camera. It comes with the most impressive lens, though. The GH1 isn’t significantly smaller than any of the other DSLRs on test. To read the marketing bumph you could be forgiven for expecting an incredibly small camera with DSLR-like quality, but this isn’t the case. The sensor uses Panasonic’s take on the Micro Four Thirds standard, a derivative of the Four Thirds sensor found in the Olympus E-450. It doesn’t have the traditional mirror, shutter and curtain arrangement of traditional DSLRs – instead, the sensor is on all the time, and the viewfinder is simply a very small LCD screen, complementing the pivoting 3in, 460,000 pixel screen on the back. ![]() The Panasonic DMC-GH1 is something of a wild card in the DSLR market. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |